
The election of Ganna Yudkivska ends a long period of uncertainty, in which every time ad hoc judges had to be appointed for applications concerning the Ukraine. For several years (at least since 2007) a battle raged over the list of three candidates. Ukraine had submitted an entirely new list after one of the initial candidates withdrew. This led to such dismay at the Parliamentary Assdembly, that in the end the Court was asked by the Committee of Ministers to issue an Advisory Opinion. See my earlier posts here and here. Interestingly, Mrs Yudkisvska was the only candidate on the original list on which no very big controversy seemed to exist. No doubt the turbulent political situation in the Ukraine has a lot to do with the whole controversy. It is good that now at least there will be again a fixed judge in respect of Ukraine. After all, there is a lot of work to do, with Ukraine being in the top 4 of countries against which the Court issues judgments.
One may note that one day earlier, on Monday, president Viktor Yanukovych visited the Court. On the same day, he also addressed the Parliamentary Assembly in a speech, in which not a word was said on the whole issue.